25.7 C
Willemstad
• dinsdag 31 januari 2023

NOS | Bezoek Oranjes aan Aruba: warm ontvangst met cadeautjes

De koning, koningin Máxima en de prinses van Oranje zijn vandaag aangekomen op Aruba. Het was voor het drietal dag vier van de rondreis door het Caribisch...

AD | Aruba verwelkomt prinses Amalia, Willem-Alexander en Máxima

Na een dag rust staan er weer een hoop activiteiten op de planning voor prinses Amalia, koning Willem-Alexander en koningin Máxima. Het gezelschap komt maandagochtend lokale...

Democracy now! | Monday, January 30, 2023

Democracy Now! is a national, daily, independent, award-winning news program hosted by journalists Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez. Democracy Now!’s War and Peace Report provides our audience...
- Advertentie -

Extra | Journaal 30 januari 2023

Elke werkdag het laatste nieuws van Extra, nu ook in het Nederlands. Bron: Extra

PBC | Godett wil Cicely van der Dijs vrij krijgen door oproep aan de koning

Persbureau Curacao WILLEMSTAD – Anthony Godett spant zich in om Cicely van der Dijs vrij te krijgen. Hij doet een oproep aan koning Willem Alexander om gratie te...

PBC | Thierry Baudet spreekt vanavond op Curaçao

Persbureau Curacao WILLEMSTAD – Thierry Baudet is op Curaçao. Vanavond spreekt hij in de Papagayo Beach Club over de visie van de partij voor Caribisch Nederland, zo twittert...

PBC | Bonaire: Wie gekozen wil worden om daarna voor de Eerste Kamer te stemmen, moet zich vandaag geregistreerd hebben

Persbureau Curacao KRALENDIJK – Vandaag kunnen de namen van de mensen die zich kandidaat stellen voor de eilandraadsverkiezingen voor Bonaire, Sint-Eustatius en Saba worden ingeleverd, zij vormen drie...
- Advertentie -

DH | Lawyer outraged by ‘scandalous’ behaviour of Civil Service Court

Geert Hatzmann

PHILIPSBURG–Lawyer Geert Hatzmann has filed a complaint with the Joint Court of Justice pertaining to what he described as the “scandalous” behaviour of three judges in the Civil Service Court.

On November 23, Hatzmann filed a complaint against all members of the Court of Appeals in Civil Service Cases (“Raad van Beroep in Ambtenarenzaken”) in St. Maarten, who handled a case against one of his clients on November 19.

Hatzmann said that during the hearing of that case his client’s appeal was declared inadmissible because he had submitted the appeal documents approximately one week too late.

‘Misery’

In the appeal documents, the lawyer explained that during his vacation in the Netherlands, where he went to celebrate his parents’ 40th wedding anniversary, he was confronted with the fact that his mother was terminally ill, knowledge which she had concealed from his brothers and him. A few weeks after his arrival in the Netherlands, his mother died at the age of 63.

“This was a very emotional and traumatic event that affected me very much, and which resulted in the fact that I was not able to practice law for some time or to arrange for a colleague to act on my behalf, apart from the complications of converting my return ticket to St. Maarten,” the lawyer explained.

“Anyone with feelings in his or her gut would be able to understand such a situation and adopt a courteous and accommodating attitude towards one confronted with such misery, but not this Court of Appeals. Despite the fact that there only was a short delay, which did not result in any disadvantage, this Court of Appeals considered it necessary to accuse me of failing to make a colleague file a request to extend the appeal term on my behalf. This could have been expected of me, and because of my omission, no appeal was due for urgent or compelling reasons, which resulted in the appeal being declared inadmissible.

“Apparently the death of my mother – which I still cannot get over two years later – should not affect me in such a way that I ‘went off the rails’ for a short time and left everything entirely. It is nothing short of astonishing to me that judges can reach a harsh, inhuman, and offensive judgment,” he stated.

The court’s judgement is also “frightening,” Hatzmann wrote in a letter to president of the Joint Court Eunice Saleh on November 23. “If judges can reach such a decision, they display a poignant lack of empathy and in my view – however much they may be legally educated – they are fundamentally unfit to hold office. Judges render judgments to solve problems between people and if judges do not understand anything about people then their decisions have no authority,” Hatzmann stated in his letter.

He also informed the court president that he had lost confidence in the three Appeals Court judges involved in this issue, and that he would be filing to recuse in case any of them were to preside over a case in which he acts as an attorney.

Complaint inadmissible

In her response, the court president stated that the board of the Joint Court of Justice had declared Hatzmann’s complaint inadmissible. “The complaint you have submitted relates to the content of a court decision. On the grounds of the complaint procedure, complaints cannot be made about the content and the justification for a decision of judges or about the process of reaching a judicial decision, including decisions taken in that context of a procedural nature. In view of the foregoing, the board has come to the conclusion that your complaint should be declared inadmissible,” Saleh wrote in a letter dated December 14.

“This response shows that Mrs. Saleh has misunderstood the purpose of my complaint,” Hatzmann said in response to what he described as a “cold and business-like” letter. “For me, it is not so much about achieving a positive result in the case in question, but – first and foremost – to address the appalling lack of empathy of these judges. In my view, these judges have given themselves a certificate of incapacity and I had expected the [court – Ed.] president to apologise and take action against these judges. However, Mrs. Saleh does not go into the matter at all and brushes me off with a formal standard consideration and thus emphatically protects her colleagues.”

The lawyer said he was “very outraged” at this turn of events and feels that the public in St. Maarten has the right to be informed that their highest judges are lacking in social skills and empathy. “As I explained in my complaint, this greatly detracts from the authority of their statements and justifies the question whether they are fit for office.”

Bron: Daily Herald

Artikel delen

Dit artikel is geplaatst in

3 reacties

  1. Monday, May 10th 2021/20:501Mr. Hartzmann will find his biased remarks eventually backfire on him when not aware of his surroundings. I will however be troubled if a president of a court of justice will use his remarks to miss- apply the law for this purpose. This suggests a scant knowledge of the law by using it as a blunt instrument. To accommodate the law and its use in practice requires an in depth knowledge grown mature by experience and intellectual prowess.
    It is not very good for the people who rely on the law to have a hardnose in function. Even being an “” Iron lady”” requires sound knowledge of the law.

  2. Alhoewel Ik begrip kan op brengen voor de gevoelens van deze advocaat moet hij wel realistisch blijven. Als het zijn client voordeel zou op brengen zou hij hetzelfde stand punt gaan in nemen als in dit geval het gerecht en er op staan dat de letter van de wet zou worden toegepast.

Geef een reactie

Vul alstublieft uw commentaar in!
Vul hier uw naam in

Lees ook

Zoeken

- Advertentie -

Nieuwe reacties

- Advertentie -