29 C
• zaterdag 30 september 2023

Telegraaf | Man gearresteerd in onderzoek naar moord op rapper Tupac Shakur

De politie in Las Vegas heeft een man gearresteerd in het onderzoek naar de moord op de wereldberoemde rapper Tupac Shakur 27 jaar geleden. Dat melden Amerikaanse...

Democracy now! | Friday, September 29, 2023

Democracy Now! is a national, daily, independent, award-winning news program hosted by journalists Amy Goodman and Juan Gonzalez. Democracy Now!’s War and Peace Report provides our audience...

Extra | Journaal 29 september 2023

Elke werkdag het laatste nieuws van Extra, nu ook in het Nederlands. Bron: Extra

DolfijnFM | Herdenkingsmonument Julianabrug wordt gerenoveerd

Het herdenkingsmonument, dat is geplaatst voor de slachtoffers van het instorten van de Julianabrug, wordt aangepakt. Zo is de verlichting niet meer up to date, en wordt...

DolfijnFM | Groot concert ter ere van Tula

Op het Brionplein vindt morgen het Bos di Libertat-festival plaats, een groot concert ter ere van Tula. Het concert is onderdeel van de Siman di Kultura en...

DolfijnFM | Ministers om tafel voor oplossing geweld op scholen

De ministeries van Onderwijs en Justitie hebben samengezeten om geweld op scholen aan te pakken. Het is al langer bekend dat vechtpartijen op scholen toenemen, dus was...
- Advertisement -spot_img

721news | Bary requested to question several witnesses in Judith Roumou case

HomeNieuws721news | Bary requested to question several witnesses in Judith Roumou case

*** media release from the attorney of Ms. Judith Roumou ***

Press release regarding prosecution blogger Judith Roumou
Press release regarding prosecution blogger Judith Roumou | Foto 721news.com

PHILIPSBURG – For immediate release – July 11, 2015. On behalf of my client Ms. J. Roumou, I would like to make the following known:

I have requested the public prosecutor to hear several witnesses, including some of my client’s accusers, officers of the St Maarten Police Force as well as the prosecutor who was handling this case (T. Kamps).

This request was extremely detailed and supported by facts and circumstances that question the potential ulterior motives behind said accusers and police officers to be willing to insist on an arrest and prosecution of my client in this case. In my previous media release I outlined what potential ulterior motives could be.

I also outlined the fact that I wanted to hear the individual who works at Stichting Justiele Inrichtingen Bovenwindse Eilanden who without motivating her reasoning, concluded that my client should be released but that she would have to (among other things) be subjected to talks and or tests by the Mental Health Foundation. I explained to the Judge of Instruction that I have noticed a deliberate attempt to have my client classified as crazy as a way to nullify her remarks and/or silence her.

I have also outlined that I find it unbelievable that simply reading the hard drive of my client’s laptops, etc has taken more than 10 days already whereas securing the information on a hard drive is a matter of maximum a couple of hours. The longer the laptops remain in police custody, the more I have reason to question what exactly is being done with my clients items. My client is considering filing an injunction case next week to obtain her items as she is dependent on those items to provide for herself.

The public prosecutor has (K Van Nie), despite sufficient reason to do so, has informed the Judge of Instruction yesterday (July 10th 2015) that she wants the Judge of Instruction to refuse my requests to hear witnesses because my client is no longer in custody, and according to her, my client would no longer have the right to call for witnesses as a consequence thereof.

Ms. Van Nie also indicated that she, who also has the right to hear witnesses regardless as to whether or not my client is [still] detained, does not see the need to hear the witnesses.

I informed the judge yesterday evening that I consider the response of the public prosecutor’s office to be alarming and concerning as the goal of the public prosecutor’s office in a criminal investigation is and must always be to find out the truth of the matter regardless as to who is the person filing the complaint and who is the person being accused of committing a crime.

I further informed the Judge of Instruction that I am beginning to seriously question who’s interests the public prosecutor’s office is protecting and if they are using their power to (continue) to hide the real reason my client was arrested and to continue to muzzle my client.

As my client is clearly being silenced by the public prosecutor’s office by them not returning her items to her, not hearing witnesses and not providing timely updates in this case, I was forced to bring these unfortunate developments to the public arena with my client’s permission.


*** EXCLUSIVE ***: Zylena Bary: Circumstances surrounding Judith Roumou arrest extremely bizarre.

Source: 721news.com

Dit artikel is geplaatst in

2 reacties

  1. Is it not time to take action and provider this blogger with some stuff, so she can go online again and tell us what has happend?
    Is not there someone who is willing to lent / give that non used laptop to her. Come on people, make it happen !

  2. Typical work of the CID
    Same her on Curacao.
    If they can’t handle the case you are crazy and try to indoctrinate.
    Same case as Hans Willems

Geef een reactie

Vul alstublieft uw commentaar in!
Vul hier uw naam in


Recente reacties